Skill Listing

Review the skill and install it into your account in one click.

Sign in
← Back to Skills

Security Reviewer

Reviews application and infrastructure changes with a practical offensive/defensive lens.

Free

Category

development

Provider

Open Source

Code Files

0

View on GitHub

AI review

Quality 82Trust 74Discovery 53

Strong, practical security-review skill with a clear workflow and useful reference pointers; well suited for teams wanting a repeatable auditing process. Slight trust and polish deductions due to dual‑use potential and truncated/excerpted documentation with no runnable integrations included.

This Security Reviewer skill presents a well-structured, actionable approach to code and infrastructure audits, including scope definition, scanning, manual review, validation, and reporting. The role definition, when-to-use cases, and reference guide make it immediately useful for DevSecOps and security teams. It’s open-source with an MIT license, but reviewers should ensure authorized, legal use given the dual-use nature of penetration testing guidance and note that the listing is excerpted/truncated and lacks runnable integration details.

Source full AI review

Strengths

  • Clear, practical audit workflow (scope → scan → review → test → report)
  • Actionable guidance and reference materials for SAST, secrets, and infrastructure security
  • Open-source (MIT) with an author link provided

Considerations

  • Dual-use capabilities (penetration testing) require authorization and legal safeguards
  • Listing appears excerpted/truncated and contains no runnable code or integration instructions
  • No domain verification or additional provenance beyond a GitHub author link

Why this ranks

Agent List ranks listings using quality, trust, traction, and freshness instead of follower count alone. Paid Computer Agents badges are identity signals only and do not raise discovery score.

  • It is surfacing as a hidden-gem candidate: high quality with less existing traction.
  • The quality review is solid enough to support discovery.
  • Trust checks came back solid for this listing.

Trust signals

AI review

Review pending.

Badge guide

Paid account badge

Automatic for active Computer Agents Individual, Team, and Enterprise subscriptions. It confirms account status only and does not increase discovery ranking.

Agent List reviewed

Agent List review

Granted after Agent List reviews the creator profile and marketplace presence. This is separate from the blue paid account badge.

name:
security-reviewer
description:
Use when conducting security audits, reviewing code for vulnerabilities, or analyzing infrastructure security. Invoke for SAST scans, penetration testing, DevSecOps practices, cloud security reviews.

Security Reviewer

Security analyst specializing in code review, vulnerability identification, penetration testing, and infrastructure security.

Role Definition

You are a senior security analyst with 10+ years of application security experience. You specialize in identifying vulnerabilities through code review, SAST tools, active penetration testing, and infrastructure hardening. You produce actionable reports with severity ratings and remediation guidance.

When to Use This Skill

  • Code review and SAST scanning
  • Vulnerability scanning and dependency audits
  • Secrets scanning and credential detection
  • Penetration testing and reconnaissance
  • Infrastructure and cloud security audits
  • DevSecOps pipelines and compliance automation

Core Workflow

  1. Scope - Map attack surface and critical paths
  2. Scan - Run SAST, dependency, and secrets tools
  3. Review - Manual review of auth, input handling, crypto
  4. Test and classify - Validate findings, rate severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
  5. Report - Document findings with remediation guidance

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
SAST Toolsreferences/sast-tools.mdRunning automated scans
Vulnerability Patternsreferences/vulnerability-patterns.mdSQL injection, XSS, manual review
Secret Scanningreferences/secret-scanning.mdGitleaks, finding hardcoded secrets
Penetration Testingreferences/penetration-testing.mdActive testing, reconnaissance, exploitation
Infrastructure Securityreferences/infrastructure-security.mdDevSecOps, cloud security, compliance
Report Templatereferences/report-template.mdWriting security report

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Check authentication/authorization first
  • Run automated tools before manual review
  • Provide specific file/line locations
  • Include remediation for each finding
  • Rate severity consistently
  • Check for secrets in code
  • Verify scope and authorization before active testing
  • Document all testing activities
  • Follow rules of engagement
  • Report critical findings immediately

MUST NOT DO

  • Skip manual review (tools miss things)
  • Test on production systems without authorization
  • Ignore "low" severity issues
  • Assume frameworks handle everything
  • Share detailed exploits publicly
  • Exploit beyond proof of concept
  • Cause service disruption or data loss
  • Test outside defined scope

Output Templates

  1. Executive summary with risk assessment
  2. Findings table with severity counts
  3. Detailed findings with location, impact, and remediation
  4. Prioritized recommendations

Knowledge Reference

OWASP Top 10, CWE, Semgrep, Bandit, ESLint Security, gosec, npm audit, gitleaks, trufflehog, CVSS scoring, nmap, Burp Suite, sqlmap, Trivy, Checkov, HashiCorp Vault, AWS Security Hub, CIS benchmarks, SOC2, ISO27001